1
necessarz & unwise
Governors
cases should in the first instance be dealt with by the Supreme Court, would be un but I am far from thinking that the five mon three alternatives in par! 21 Exhaust the possibilities. those alternatives as explained
with
does away
1/2
Mais despatch
The third
-par. 029
8629
to be
see par. H
11
Explained in par. any "proof of guilt the Tientsin Treaty, & seems required by the Fontein a most lazy & unjustifiable proforal.
Why not adopt the proposals in the Draft
are 10641/ Bill of 1875/200
away
which does of M. Ruvert
with one (under
the Governing,
?
Ord. of 1850) to review the Magistrate's decisim, forly leaves him the ministerial function of ordering the Surrender in the same
the fec. of State does in England wany In that case the Magistrates would have no trmptation to act perfunctorily (ael M.
22022/87) Bramsting minut
an
because
fre decision quld only be reversed
Mein J
in a
ON
As as
Duistakes of you
aspublic fashion by the Stigher Court in In proceeding on a writ of Habeas Corpus;
Minat definite pandor of appeal from the Magistrate's decision were thought desirable
Ord. 1 of 1881 (222 8629/81 we might follow s. VI (Macan seedellin Ord.), which arranger fü
appeal procedure?
Extendition
for
If that be done the Schedule (conc. 3) of Extradition crimes will require
S'ler
crimes are
taken almost
revising, & might perhaps be arranged between the 7.0. & Chinese Minister in Leander
The first twenty verbatim from the Swiss & Austrian Exten ditim treaties forwarded to HtKary back and may therefore be approved?
E
7.0. 2368
The first five of the propood additional to the Schedule need not perhaps be objected to? ("Piracy by law of nation" is in the Eight of 1870) "Perhaps also the seventh and ninth my stand? The sixthe Ishould imagine in doubtful, as custody NUTE PAPERcult to define. " lawful custody
suppose
And if we adh(as Juffore wraught)
The direction in
463
the 1876 desp. to introduce the definition of Extradition Crune given. Extradition Act of 1870: viz.
in the English.
Extrad. crim
..
the
means a crine which of committed in England or within Ery, jurisdiction would be me of the crimes described in the schedule wanna the last of proposed additional crimes cannot be
with admitted unto the Schedule? Asb their
no attention to 7.0. letter
the fu. pay
th
25 Feb. Cast / 3888/08) which suggest that if the appropriation of Examsin papers.
was
J
the nature
an
Carceny, it would already be
if Extraditable offence, & I think) implied that
the papers
were taken by mistake it ought next to be extraditable. In
arrry
Cate
vague Ofence defen description "Offences connected with public Exam. "aught not to be approved?
was
As to then Eiglatte, it seems doubtful, as the "purchase of munitions seems to included under the "political
category, for which we cannot extradite? As regards the second propoul
2388/76 2388% would it noth par. 3f desf. "be better to embody that in the Ord an in Art. VIII of the Swiss Extradition
£2388/76
Yes. it was to donated by
the 20 liter
despatel Sas
as
treaty, attached to
ce
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.